<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bellascribe.com/blog/2007/02/14/dear-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bellascribe.com/blog/2007/02/14/dear-heart/</link>
	<description>Something about beauty, truth, and writing</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Parke</title>
		<link>http://bellascribe.com/blog/2007/02/14/dear-heart/#comment-19767</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Parke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bellascribe.com/blog/2007/02/14/dear-heart/#comment-19767</guid>
		<description>One cannot forget Strindberg, a fan of Edvard Munch and his smoky mirror vision of women. 

"The Vampire's Kiss" by Munch holds down one end of a hall in the Metropolitan Museum while a pre-Raphaelite Joan of Arc, her eyes glittering with all-of-sky, haunts the opposing corner. Not-God vs. God.

Rodin's people struggle from marble in between--not quite flesh and not quite stone. A disappointingly small bronze of Balzac strides through it all. How can Balzac be that small?

In "The Vampire's Kiss," a title given by a critic and not Munch some say, a red-haired woman consumes the neck of a man that clings to her. One cannot help but notice the mad music in Munch's paint strokes as the man's black coat descends into a river of deep blue sparks. I wonder why Munch painted it that way? 

But back to Strindberg, and women, and Valentines be they may. Strindberg: "I love her, and she loves me, and together we hate each other with a wild hatred born of love." 

Itâ€™s not Hallmark, but itâ€™s not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One cannot forget Strindberg, a fan of Edvard Munch and his smoky mirror vision of women. </p>
<p>&#8220;The Vampire&#8217;s Kiss&#8221; by Munch holds down one end of a hall in the Metropolitan Museum while a pre-Raphaelite Joan of Arc, her eyes glittering with all-of-sky, haunts the opposing corner. Not-God vs. God.</p>
<p>Rodin&#8217;s people struggle from marble in between&#8211;not quite flesh and not quite stone. A disappointingly small bronze of Balzac strides through it all. How can Balzac be that small?</p>
<p>In &#8220;The Vampire&#8217;s Kiss,&#8221; a title given by a critic and not Munch some say, a red-haired woman consumes the neck of a man that clings to her. One cannot help but notice the mad music in Munch&#8217;s paint strokes as the man&#8217;s black coat descends into a river of deep blue sparks. I wonder why Munch painted it that way? </p>
<p>But back to Strindberg, and women, and Valentines be they may. Strindberg: &#8220;I love her, and she loves me, and together we hate each other with a wild hatred born of love.&#8221; </p>
<p>Itâ€™s not Hallmark, but itâ€™s not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
